The following article is from the spring 2009 issue of Bernie Schaeffer's SENTIMENT magazine, which is designed specifically for those interested in trading options. Every issue of SENTIMENT includes educational pieces for newcomers to options trading, as well as advanced strategy stories to help experienced traders build their portfolios. Please click here if you would like to receive your own copy of the next quarterly issue of SENTIMENT.
One of the things that I learned as a professional trader was that I didn't always have to be right to make money. I may be speculating that a stock will go up, but even if it doesn't, I can still squeeze out a profit. The way I do that is with short verticals. I put the probabilities on my side by selling an out-of-the-money put vertical if I think the stock will go up, or selling an out-of-the-money call vertical if I think the stock will go down.
In very broad terms, a stock can go up, down, or stay the same. A short out-of-the-money vertical can make money in two of those three scenarios, especially when the stock "stays the same" and doesn't move very much at all. Trading verticals turns the old rule "buy low, sell high" on its head. When I have a short vertical, I'm hoping to sell high, buy low.
A vertical option spread is made up of a short (sold) option and a long (bought) option, both either calls or puts, and both in the same expiration month. A vertical can be bullish or bearish, or have a more neutral directional bias—where the outcome is decided by what the stock doesn't do, rather than what it does do. In that sense, it is just another tool for you to use when you speculate on the direction of a stock. It lets you have a wider range of stock prices where the position can be profitable.
Vertical Mechanics
With short verticals, you take in a credit because you sell the strike closer to the money and buy a cheaper, further out-of-the money strike. Let's look at an example where we are bullish on that old favorite, XYZ trading at $100, and we're thinking about selling an out-of-the money put vertical. It's not complicated. It could mean selling an XYZ $95 strike put and buying an XYZ $90 put, all for, say, a $1.50 credit. The max risk of a short vertical is the distance between the strikes (in our example, $5 or 5 points) minus the credit received. If you sell a 5-point vertical for a $1.50 credit, the max risk is $350. In our XYZ trade, even if the stock goes to zero, we still only lose $350. On the other hand we also make money as long as the stock price is anywhere above $93.50 (the breakeven point) at expiration (see Figure 1). Breakeven is simply the short strike minus the credit for a short put vertical, or, adding the credit to the short call in a short call vertical.
Why puts and not calls if you think the stock is going up? It might seem counterintuitive, but that's the nature of the short vertical. If you're selling a put, you want the stock to stay above the short strike to avoid a loss. Likewise, if you're bearish and want to sell a vertical, you use calls. Our XYZ short put vertical would make money if the stock goes up, stays the same, or even drops a few points. The max profit is limited to the credit you receive—$150. Not very impressive, you say. But given the much wider range of stock prices where the position is profitable (i.e. up, sideways, or even down some), the short put vertical has a higher probability of profit than other directional strategies, such as long calls.
While a distinct advantage of a long call is its unlimited upside potential, the short put vertical benefits from just about everything that can hurt a long call, which makes it a nice alternative when the stars aren't fully aligned for your call strategy. For example:
Time passing? The short put vertical likes that because it has positive time decay, meaning time is working for you as the spread drops in value each passing day. That's good when you're short!
Volatility crush? A drop in volatility prior to expiration actually helps you as the spread you sold becomes cheaper to buy back. Also, when volatility is lower, there's less of a chance that the stock will make a big move down and create a loss on that short put spread.
Wrong direction? If the stock stays where it is or moves down a bit, the short put spread can still make money. For example, if XYZ goes up $2, the short put vertical makes $150. If XYZ goes down $2, the short put vertical makes $150. If XYZ stays right at $100, the short put vertical makes $150. See a pattern here? As long as XYZ is above the short $95 put at expiration, XYZ put vertical makes its maximum profit of $150. In fact, it makes some money as long as the stock is above the breakeven point of $93.50. And as we get closer to expiration? Well, that put spread you sold just gets cheaper and cheaper.
Vertical Recap–The Bennies and Caveats
The point of a short vertical is that you don't have to be exactly right on the direction of the stock, the magnitude of the move, or the timing of that move, assuming you're out of the money. And short verticals have certain characteristics that make them attractive. Because you're short a closer-to-the-money option, you get positive time decay. And because you're long and short an option, preferably with adjacent strikes, short verticals don't have a lot of sensitivity to changes in volatility. The way I like to think of short verticals is that I am selling an option and capturing positive time decay, but I have a hedge in the long option—which defines my risk and reduces the margin required.
Does this sound like a cool strategy? Absolutely. But it wouldn't be completely fair to let you walk away from this article without understanding some of the shortcomings of the short vertical—and there are a few. First, as mentioned, you're limited in what you can make per trade, since your upside is capped to the credit you receive. Second, at times, the margin you'll need to put up can be higher relative to a long call or put around the same strikes, which does tie up your capital somewhat (though much less so than the strategy's cousin—the short, naked put). Finally, high volatility in the absence of a trend can make it difficult to stomach wild, unpredictable swings, such as those we saw in the crash late last year. Sudden drops in the market on those 500-point down days could render your beautifully executed vertical a shell of its former self, or even a complete loss. But no strategy is perfect—just different or better in some circumstances—and the short vertical isn't the exception.
More Nuggets
A little extra tip on trading short verticals is an easy way to estimate the probability of success—just take the max risk and divide it by the distance between the strikes. So, if the max risk of a vertical is $350 and the distance between the strikes is $500, there is an approximate 70% probability (350 divided by 500) of that short vertical making money at expiration.
One more thing about short verticals is that you can trade them in IRAs, where you have to get creative if you want to speculate that a stock is going down. You can't short stock, and you can't short naked calls. You could buy a put, but that has all the same problems as a long call. So, when you find a stock that you're bearish on, some basic criteria on finding a short vertical would be to look at the options that have roughly 30 days to expiration, and then find an out-of-the money call vertical that has an approximate 70% probability of success. It's no guarantee of profitability, but you will have a better chance of making money than if you buy an out-of-the-money put.
Versatility, defined risk, and positive time decay are all reasons why professional traders make short verticals a cornerstone of their strategies. And in markets like we've been seeing lately, it's why savvy retail traders are using them, too.
Discuss this article:
Post your own comment
More articles:
Welcome to our new video series, Options Stew, where we take a look back at what's been cookin' in the option pits this week. Join us as we sample just a few of the unusual option plays from the past week, with our "recipe" broken down into three unique segments: read more...
"Standard & Poor's, the world's leading index provider, announced today the launch of the S&P 500 Dynamic VEQTOR Index which dynamically allocates between equity, volatility and cash to provide broad equity market exposure with an implied volatility hedge. 'Implied equity volatility typically has a strong negative correlation to equity market returns, and is considered a useful tool to hedge against the potential downside risk of the broad equity market,' says Liz Taxin, Director of Strategy Indices for S&P Indices. The S&P 500 Dynamic VEQTOR Index is comprised of three components: Equity, as represented by the S&P 500; Volatility, as represented by the S&P 500 Short-Term VIX Futures Index; and Cash, as represented by the Overnight LIBOR rate. The Index allocates between equity and volatility based on the combination of realized and implied volatility trend decision variables, and these allocations are evaluated on a daily basis." (PR newswire – 11/18/09) read more...
Retailers continue to line up for the earnings confessional, and one particular high-flyer is slated to release its quarterly report next week. J. Crew Group Inc. (JCG: sentiment, chart, options) is known for its preppy fashions, including jeans, khakis, and other basic (but often pricey) items sold to young professionals. J. Crew sells through its catalogs, Web sites, and some 300 retail and outlet stores in the U.S. under the J. Crew, crewcuts (for kids), and Madewell banners. Madewell, launched in 2006, is a women's-only collection of hip, casual clothes. read more...
Rowan Companies Inc. (RDC: sentiment, chart, options) performs contract drilling of oil and gas wells. Its fleet consists of 22 jack-up rigs and 32 land-drilling rigs. The company operates primarily in the Middle East, Texas, the Gulf of Mexico, and the North Sea. read more...
Bearish option bettors have virtually blitzed ISIS Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ISIS: sentiment, chart, options) today, with intraday put volume skyrocketing to nearly 38 times the norm. The pharmaceutical firm this morning confessed that it's delaying plans to seek approval for experimental drug mipomersen by nearly a year, from mid-2010 to mid-2011. read more...
Sears Holdings Corporation (SHLD: sentiment, chart, options) has been a hot topic on both sides of the options aisle today, as investors race to place their bets ahead of the retailer's looming turn on the earnings stage. According to Thomson Reuters, the firm is expected to report its third-quarter figures before the opening bell on Thursday, Nov. 19. read more...
Options players are placing some heavy bets that salesforce.com inc. (CRM: sentiment, chart, options) is going to suffer a disappointing earnings report next week, as traders load up on puts. The International Securities Exchange (ISE) has reported 2.7 puts purchased to open for every one call purchased to open during the past 10 trading sessions. This ratio of puts to calls is higher than 93.8% of all those taken during the past year. In other words, puts are significantly more popular than calls among traders. read more...
The video game sector is struggling. U.S. video game sales dropped by 18% in October compared to the same period last year, according to the latest data from NPD Group. Meanwhile, analysts had forecast a more modest decline of 11%. read more...
Call traders have been fond of First Solar, Inc. (FSLR: sentiment, chart, options) today, despite the solar concern's retreat into the red. In afternoon trading, the security has already seen roughly 18,000 calls cross the tape – nearly tripling its average intraday volume of fewer than 6,250 contracts. read more...
Today's Most Popular Stories