Schaeffer's Media Outtake: Weighing Stocks vs. Bonds

Bond fund giant sees a 'new normal'

by Bernie Schaeffer 10/16/2009 2:50 PM


"The sacred texts of investing need to be rewritten. It turns out that the so-called equity risk premium, the once-sacrosanct belief that stocks perform better than bonds over time, has been vastly overrated. Earlier this year, according to the Leuthold Group, a Minneapolis research firm, U.S. Treasury bonds had outperformed U.S. stocks over the preceding 10- and 20-year periods. And that was only the beginning. Bonds also beat stocks over the past 30 years. Even the 40-year returns were basically equal, a feat never before witnessed in the U.S. markets. Over other periods, of course, stocks performed far better. But for four decades they were a sucker's bet. If the bedrock principle of investing—that shareholders are compensated over the long term for the risk of buying equities—is a fallacy, then what, if anything, can investors believe in? ... The executives at Pacific Investment Management, or PIMCO, say they have the answer. The bond fund giant has adopted the phrase 'new normal' to describe the changes taking place. 'If you are a child of the bull market, it's time to grow up and become a chastened adult,' writes William H. Gross, manager of PIMCO Total Return (PTTRX), the world's largest bond fund, in his September dispatch to investors. 'It's time to recognize that things have changed and that they will continue to change for the next—yes, the next 10 years and maybe even the next 20' ... According to PIMCO's new normal, equities should make up just 30% to 54% of a portfolio, with no more than half in the U.S.—much less than the traditional 60% commitment to stocks and 40% to bonds. Of course, PIMCO, a bond shop, has an incentive to paint stocks as less attractive. But other asset managers are sounding a similar theme ... The California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS), the nation's largest pension fund, is in a political dogfight. Its asset value in 2008 plunged a record 23.4%, worse than the performance of a basic 60/40 stock/bond portfolio. The $56.2 billion loss wiped out six years of earnings for CalPERS' 1.6 million working and retired clients, according to Bloomberg. 'We're still negotiating what's happening in the markets,' says a CalPERS spokesman. 'Like everyone else, we don't have a crystal ball.' Far from it. According to internal documents reviewed by BusinessWeek, CalPERS in 1999 was assuming it would generate annual returns of 8.25% over the following decade ... Amid the sharpest stock market rally in decades, CalPERS has cut its stock holdings from 56% to 49% and plans to devote much of its proceeds to illiquid investments."
(BusinessWeek – "Investing gauges are broken, market signals are mixed, and money managers don't know where to turn. What exactly is the 'new normal'"? – 10/5/09 issue)

"With this market up 59% from the bottom, many investors may feel as though they missed these gains and need to wait for another entry point. Depending on your time horizon, that is not necessarily the case. If we look at the last period when ten year returns were negative, we find that the ten year return going forward is an average of 163%. In other words, on days when the ten year return on the S&P was negative (this is roughly 640 trading days) the average return going forward ten years was 163% and the minimum return was 78%. Anyone with a time horizon of at least ten years should stay in stocks."
(Ticker Sense – Birinyi Associates, Inc. – 10/13/09)

Schaeffer's addendum: It is truly remarkable how the market's historical performance influences attitudes about the future. The BusinessWeek cover story cited above basically repudiates the concept that stock returns are superior in the long run to bond returns. The most prominent mutual fund management firm wants us to believe there is a "new normal" of stunted economic growth and earnings gains that calls for equities to account for a much smaller portion of an investment portfolio than the typical 60%. And CalPERS – the giant pension fund which in 1999 developed the wildly bullish forecast that the stock market would generate 8.25% annual returns over the subsequent decade – "has cut its stock holdings from 56% to 49% and plans to devote much of its proceeds to illiquid investments."

Laszlo Birinyi then applies his usual common sense analysis in calling for bucking the doom and gloom and remaining fully invested.

This market does have some short-term issues, some of which I'm sure our Todd Salamone will be discussing this weekend in his next Monday Morning Outlook, but from a longer-term perspective the ongoing combination of strong price action with deep-seated skeptical sentiment remains a very compelling "one-two punch" for an aggressive allocation to stocks.

Today's Most Popular Stories




Featured Companies


Receive FREE access to Schaeffer’s
Sentiment Spring 2009
premier online options magazine!



Partner Center